X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 396FFD1B52F; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:50:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 31092-02; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:50:18 -0400 (AST)
Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 64320D1B507; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:50:14 -0400 (AST)
Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E2AAE34430; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:48:07 -0400 (AST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E031F3431B; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:48:07 -0400 (AST)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:48:07 -0400 (AST)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>,
	Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org,
	pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
In-Reply-To: <1068478302.10947.12283.camel@camel>
Message-ID: <20031110114432.R727@ganymede.hub.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311062316480.29650-100000@peter.localdomain>
	<200311062242.57449.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	<200311071051.04002.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<1068478302.10947.12283.camel@camel>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200311/120
X-Sequence-Number: 2767



On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Robert Treat wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 13:51, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > really the most important thing here is that we get some movement on the
> > > site in order to ditch the old VM the site lives on and get it on our new
> > > web VM.
> >
> > On techdocs?   What part of that needs to be migrated?
> >
>
> Last I check it was the whole thing... techdocs runs on its own VM, the
> other sites all run on a different VM. We need to kill the old VM, but
> until we move techdocs to it's new home, we can't

And there is no pressure/hurry for this to be done ... its not a 'simple
move', but a redesign based on new technology ... what is there now,
works, so no pressure