Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Organization: Aglio Database Solutions
To: Chris Ryan <xgbe@yahoo.com>, Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>,
	Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>,
	"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: gforge
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:39:29 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
References: <20031201182609.2644.qmail@web40010.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031201182609.2644.qmail@web40010.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <200312011039.29068.josh@agliodbs.com>

Chris,

>     If GBorg stays it will need effort and participation from the
> community in order to make it into a better development platform. That
> is not something I can do by my self.

Well, the main reason to move toward GForge is that it is being actively 
maintained and improved by  an outside community of people, while you've been 
on your lonesome for some time.     Given the number of other projects for 
which we need more people, I personally don't see anyone having the time to 
put in the work GBorg needs to "catch up" any time soon.

So my personal questions for you are:  a) what do you, personally, think about 
Gforge's architecture, community, and future?  b) how does gforge stack up 
against Sourceforge in your opinion?  c) if we switch away from GBorg, will 
that be the end of your involvement in the community, or are there other 
things you want to work on?

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco