X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8F2D9D1B42F; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 03:41:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 68387-09; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 23:40:57 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A901CD1B479; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 23:40:47 -0400 (AST)
Received: from p65-147.acedsl.com (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147])
	by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBG3evK9028596;
	Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:40:57 -0500
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:41:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com>
X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Requirements feedback for jobs.postgresql.org.
In-Reply-To: <20031215230446.T81928@ganymede.hub.org>
Message-ID: <20031215224054.S1592@zoraida.natserv.net>
References: <1070400141.25244.8915.camel@camel>
	<200312120908.47640.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<20031212145510.Q17041@ganymede.hub.org>
	<200312121050.34435.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<20031212161722.H81928@ganymede.hub.org>
	<20031215212300.F1205@zoraida.natserv.net>
	<20031215230446.T81928@ganymede.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200312/95
X-Sequence-Number: 3155

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Francisco Reyes wrote:
>
> > I think at the very least Employer name and location for the job. Some
> > companies may have offices in several cities or may be thinking of
> > opening a new office.
>
> re: location ... good point ... again, as the system 'fills up', the
> ability to just list jobs in specific locations (as well as All) should be
> available ...


Which brings up another point. I think most companies will NOT pay for
relocation. I think there should be a field "pay for relocation" which
should default to no. This for the rare case for companies willing to pay
some/all of the relocation expense.