X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33DBD1B436; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:05:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62031-10; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:04:19 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A5FD1B467; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:04:18 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 56DAD3A012; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:02:37 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C4839FDB; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:02:37 -0400 (AST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:02:37 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Robert Treat Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , David Fetter , PostgreSQL WWW Subject: Re: Outdated docs on techdocs In-Reply-To: <1071770536.8935.8726.camel@camel> Message-ID: <20031218150206.O3016@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20031218162658.GJ19694@fetter.org> <1071765850.25090.8647.camel@camel> <20031218165349.GL19694@fetter.org> <20031218133023.X3016@ganymede.hub.org> <1071770536.8935.8726.camel@camel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200312/128 X-Sequence-Number: 3188 On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Robert Treat wrote: > On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 12:31, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, David Fetter wrote: > > > > > I see we need to grasp a nettle here. How many versions can the > > > community support? Even 7.3 is starting to look a little long in the > > > tooth... > > > > If its a matter of existing docs for older versions, IMHO, unlimited ... > > > > I think I'm parroting Marc here... if the text is already written, why > not keep it around? We just need to clearly mark it as older > information. If you want to write something new then as far as I am > concerned you can write for the most recent brand new version and to > heck with the older cruft :-) Not sure the scope of the changes required, but would an appendum to current text not be less confusing? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664