X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF900D1B442 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:02:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77531-02 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:02:12 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DDAD1B4A6 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:02:10 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C4E1A39E83; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:00:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A5E39E82; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:00:29 -0400 (AST) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:00:29 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Francisco Reyes Cc: Josh Berkus , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Requirements feedback for jobs.postgresql.org. In-Reply-To: <20031218142507.S27657@zoraida.natserv.net> Message-ID: <20031218155827.V3016@ganymede.hub.org> References: <1070400141.25244.8915.camel@camel> <200312120908.47640.josh@agliodbs.com> <20031215211038.Q1205@zoraida.natserv.net> <200312160853.10380.josh@agliodbs.com> <20031218142507.S27657@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200312/131 X-Sequence-Number: 3191 On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Francisco Reyes wrote: > I believe DOC files can have viruses in them. As long as we allow > attachments this will be an issue. I am not saying you should not > continue with the exact same plans you have, just that we should > consider what we want to do for the long term. Note that right now, on that VM, its not setup, but all incoming and outgoing email on the main mailing list VM *is* virus checked through clamav ... there is no reason why I can't enable that on the VM that jobs is on as well, to help safeguard for this ... > Although I think it's great you are thinking ahead I don't think we will > be flooded with postings that categories will be a problem. Of all the > problems this project could possibly have I really wish someday too many > postings will be one. I just don't think it will happen any time soon. I > wish/hope I am wrong on that though. :-) Falls under: rather have it planned for, then have to try and implement it later ... included from the onset creates no problems, trying to add it in later could be a nightmare ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664