X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BD7D1B4A7 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:54:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47886-06 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:53:51 -0400 (AST) Received: from fetter.org (dsl092-188-065.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.188.65]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EF4D1B4C2 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:53:50 -0400 (AST) Received: from fetter.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by fetter.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hBIGroYm015277; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:53:50 -0800 Received: (from shackle@localhost) by fetter.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBIGroa1015275; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:53:50 -0800 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:53:50 -0800 From: David Fetter To: Robert Treat Cc: PostgreSQL WWW Subject: Re: Outdated docs on techdocs Message-ID: <20031218165349.GL19694@fetter.org> References: <20031218162658.GJ19694@fetter.org> <1071765850.25090.8647.camel@camel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1071765850.25090.8647.camel@camel> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200312/120 X-Sequence-Number: 3180 On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:44:10AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote: > On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 11:26, David Fetter wrote: > > Kind people, > > > > There are some pieces of techdocs that now supply inaccurate info. > > For example, > > http://techdocs.postgresql.org/techdocs/updatingcolumns.php > > > > says some things that are no longer true about ALTER TABLE, which > > is confusing at best. Is there some way to remove it pending > > edits? I'd be happy to do the edits :) > > Well... I can see that information being useful to people on older > systems, so I can add a disclaimer that some of the information no > longer applies to newer versions of postgresql until you can get the > editing done. Can do. Where do I get it, and how do I submit the edits? > alternatively you could rewrite the article as an update for 7.4 > systems, and I'll just put a note that the old article is being keep > for historical purposes... I see we need to grasp a nettle here. How many versions can the community support? Even 7.3 is starting to look a little long in the tooth... Cheers, D -- David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778