X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8F9D1B551; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 04:08:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03506-09; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 00:07:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [207.106.42.251]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229A9D1B4AE; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 00:07:26 -0400 (AST) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i033eWM12431; Fri, 2 Jan 2004 22:40:32 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200401030340.i033eWM12431@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: PostgreSQL websites down? In-Reply-To: <3FF63787.3060606@digitaldistribution.com> To: Justin Clift Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 22:40:32 -0500 (EST) Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , pgsql-www@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL108 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200401/3 X-Sequence-Number: 3242 Justin Clift wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Someone on IRC mentioned that everything was slow today, so that must > > have been it. I modified our IRC channel topics on EFNet and FreeNet > > when the servers became unavailable, so if this ever happens in the > > future, that would be a good place for people to look. > > Would it be worth mentioning that somewhere that's end user visible? > > :-) When the main web site is down, where else can we mention it? Or are you saying we should mention that IRC is where we will disseminate information when the main web site is down? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073