X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6F80BD1B4A7; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 06:17:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 79387-06; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 02:16:41 -0400 (AST)
Received: from curie.credativ.org (credativ.com [217.160.209.18])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 23780D1DB22; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 02:16:40 -0400 (AST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6FC39562C8; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:16:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from colt.pezone.net (dsl-213-023-254-156.arcor-ip.net
	[213.23.254.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2044456243; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:16:37 +0100 (CET)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>,
	"Ricardo Ryoiti S. Junior" <suga@netbsd.com.br>
Subject: Re: FTP Mirrors (was Re: Rewriting the website)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:16:37 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>,
	Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>,
	"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
References: <40014281.4060908@cs.msu.su>
	<Pine.WNT.4.58.0401142109040.896@qwerty>
	<20040114200559.W45512@ganymede.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040114200559.W45512@ganymede.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401150716.37742.peter_e@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS at credativ.com
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200401/255
X-Sequence-Number: 3437

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> I have nothing against making that change on the mail server, should
> have thought of that long ago, but, then again, nobody else has
> either ...

If you look at the directory structures on the mirrors, only a few of 
them would benefit from this.  Most likely, you'd just add another 
directory level for most people while not unifying much.