X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5D8D1B476 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:41:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04861-01 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:41:06 -0400 (AST) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server228.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.228]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2ECD1B43F for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:41:04 -0400 (AST) Received: from [63.195.55.98] (HELO temoku.page.agliodbs.com) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with ESMTP id 4267924; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:42:06 -0800 From: Josh Berkus Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: "Dave Page" , "PostgreSQL Web Development Mailing List" Subject: Re: http://techdocs.postgresql.org/v2 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:40:27 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B87204C9@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B87204C9@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401161340.27806.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200401/163 X-Sequence-Number: 3402 Guys, > > > was kind of my thinking as well, which was why i started > > > leaning toward using openacs. however I think josh's main > > > requirements were simply to have the > > > ability to publish articles without having to resort to > > > handcoding html. > > > ISTM user comments were secondary to him. And one other thing, based on the requirements of some of our community writers; there needs to be some ability to add "locked" content. For example, if I republish my article from Linux Magazine (due out in 2 weeks, yah!) it has to go up as "locked" content with a shared copyright. I can't have people modifying it per my agreement with Linux Magazine. Also, most mature Wiki systems allow user comments. This is a non-issue. > I just rediscovered Justin's test Plone site (which wasn't working well > when I tried it before). Despite is being only there for testing it now > seems to have nearly 500 users and appears to work quite well now. > > What do the rest of you think about this site? Justin's and my problem with Plone was that is was intolerably slow on updates and administrative interfaces; some of the admin screens took over a minute just to load. And this was with just him, me & Elein on it. Also, the plone "look" says "Plone" not "PostgreSQL". However, if it gets something up and running in a hurry, I can certainly live with that. If we've got it performing better now, it's worth a 2nd look. -- -Josh Berkus ______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________ Josh Berkus Complete information technology josh@agliodbs.com and data management solutions (415) 565-7293 for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533 and non-profit organizations. San Francisco