X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E5BD1B44A; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:24:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98869-07; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:23:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6ECED1E0C7; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:23:41 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8294439867; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:20:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8120739822; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:20:46 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:20:46 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , JanWieck@Yahoo.com, josh@agliodbs.com, jclift@ims.telstra.com.au, pgsql-www@postgresql.org, press@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [press] UltraSQL for Windows released In-Reply-To: <20040116183208.67f06573.euler@ufgnet.ufg.br> Message-ID: <20040116172000.L13900@ganymede.hub.org> References: <40064CD2.6020702@ims.telstra.com.au> <1074261220.17856.434.camel@camel> <40080282.8060803@postgresql.org> <200401160853.55651.josh@agliodbs.com> <40081259.9040905@Yahoo.com> <20040116135959.Y13900@ganymede.hub.org> <20040116183208.67f06573.euler@ufgnet.ufg.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200401/161 X-Sequence-Number: 3400 On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote: > Hi all, > > > Ummm, the logo is the standard PostgreSQL one, and postgresql.com is a > > CNAME for postgresql.org (our URL is http://www.pgsql.com) ... no > > connection to PgSQL, Inc that I'm aware of ... we have no reference to it > > on our web site ... > > > Don't we have a kind of 'logo license' like the Debian ones > (http://www.debian.org/logos/)? I think this is inappropriate (having > projects to use our image). Why? Is someone using the logo maliciously that we need to worry about? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664