X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BE0D1F6CD for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:43:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50312-03 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:43:44 -0400 (AST) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server228.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.228]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7256DD1F6A6 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:43:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from [63.195.55.98] (HELO 192.168.1.29) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with ESMTP id 4463924; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:56:26 -0800 From: Josh Berkus Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: "Dave Page" , "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" Subject: Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:54:29 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F44E@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F44E@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200402201254.29742.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/167 X-Sequence-Number: 3732 Dave, > I'm not fussed either way - I'm just trying to suggest not putting in > effort building a new VM and configuring Gforge prior to discussion. > Someone else may convince everyone that something else is better thus > wasting all your hard work. That's a very good point. Thanks, will do. -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco