X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F27BAD1B994; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:45:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 33544-05; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:45:07 -0400 (AST)
Received: from curie.credativ.org (credativ.com [217.160.209.18])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D1742D1CCCD; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:45:04 -0400 (AST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E76C355F06; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:45:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from colt.pezone.net (dsl-213-023-254-168.arcor-ip.net
	[213.23.254.168]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 551BF55EEA; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:45:06 +0100 (CET)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:45:05 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
	Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org,
	pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
References: <200402260912.54001.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<1077829449.2784.18.camel@camel> <14898.1077834578@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <14898.1077834578@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200402262345.05483.peter_e@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS at credativ.com
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200402/204
X-Sequence-Number: 3769

Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, I looked into that when core started discussing this whole
> thing awhile back.  The Red Hat port of BZ to Postgres is perfectly
> usable.

Is it available anywhere?