X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95A4D1E909 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 03:00:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96981-08 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:00:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from keow.org (unknown [69.41.247.100]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADBADD1BB15 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:00:14 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail 26902 invoked by uid 1000); 29 Feb 2004 03:03:33 -0000 Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 03:03:33 +0000 From: Tim Larson To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal Message-ID: <20040229030333.GD24612@keow.org> References: <200402260912.54001.josh@agliodbs.com> <200402290235.59924.kar@kakidata.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402290235.59924.kar@kakidata.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/979 X-Sequence-Number: 50568 On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 02:35:59AM +0100, Kaare Rasmussen wrote: > > Why GForge? > > GForge seems to be technically OK. But what about the future outlook. The home > page lists 5 projects, whereof the 4 are tests. Are you sure they will not > fold in a month or two, will they be reliable, responsive and real nice (the > three r's) ? http://gforge.org/ is not a hosting site, that is why you only found 4 test projects and the GForge project itself hosted on the site. The idea is that you download the software and host it on your own hardware. --Tim Larson