X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44704D1B476 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:15:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76248-10 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:15:11 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00023D1B44E for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:15:08 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 93AAE36D69; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:09:54 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDD236CD7; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:09:54 -0400 (AST) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:09:54 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Greg Sabino Mullane Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: March 3 outage? In-Reply-To: <1ecd6d293e1adfe16a35656bd32195a4@biglumber.com> Message-ID: <20040304100736.B66678@ganymede.hub.org> References: <1ecd6d293e1adfe16a35656bd32195a4@biglumber.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200403/35 X-Sequence-Number: 3851 On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > /usr/local/libexec/ppf_verify: pgp command failed > > gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory! > gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information > gpg: Signature made Thu Mar 4 07:45:41 2004 AST using DSA key ID 14964AC8 > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Did something happen to postgresql.org yesterday afternoon? Myself > and others geographically dispersed were unable to reach it > via web or cvs. Yes and no ... GlobalCrossing in the US blew up ... everything then got re-routed through our secondary pipe, which appears to need to be increased cause packets were getting through, but at a *very* high packet loss ... stuff I'm working on in that regard ... According to Josh, I guess the last virus going around was estimated at about 10million infections, so I'm figuring that someone(s) on GlobalCrossing network was the target for this one, and 10million simultaneous hits would be quite interesting ... :( ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664