X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F33D1C4EB for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 19:55:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55891-09 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:55:58 -0400 (AST) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server228.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.228]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF298D1B91C for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:55:51 -0400 (AST) Received: from [63.195.55.98] (HELO 192.168.1.29) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 4604190; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:57:11 -0800 From: Josh Berkus Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: Peter Eisentraut Subject: Re: pgFoundry Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:55:09 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Cc: References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F5DD@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> <200403111114.33954.josh@agliodbs.com> <200403112038.56027.peter_e@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200403112038.56027.peter_e@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403111155.09851.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200403/142 X-Sequence-Number: 3958 Peter, > Everybody had agreed to .postgresql.net, and now it's gone > without explanation. Oh! Well, if that's what you want, why didn't you say so? We can certainly change things since it's not official yet. Like I said, I wasn't clear that there was a consensus for the postgresql.net scheme. Can other people speak up about this? -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco