X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E2AD1D44F for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:08:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97920-04 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 19:08:11 -0400 (AST) Received: from lakemtao02.cox.net (lakemtao02.cox.net [68.1.17.243]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC37BD1D17D for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 19:08:03 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.0.13] ([68.105.168.67]) by lakemtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040311230810.JSPR13694.lakemtao02.cox.net@[192.168.0.13]>; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:08:10 -0500 From: Robert Treat To: josh@agliodbs.com, Peter Eisentraut Subject: Re: pgFoundry Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:08:09 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F5DD@mail.vale-housing.co.uk> <200403112038.56027.peter_e@gmx.net> <200403111155.09851.josh@agliodbs.com> In-Reply-To: <200403111155.09851.josh@agliodbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403111808.09687.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200403/144 X-Sequence-Number: 3960 On Thursday 11 March 2004 14:55, Josh Berkus wrote: > Peter, > > > Everybody had agreed to .postgresql.net, and now it's gone > > without explanation. > > Oh! Well, if that's what you want, why didn't you say so? We can > certainly change things since it's not official yet. > > Like I said, I wasn't clear that there was a consensus for the > postgresql.net scheme. Can other people speak up about this? I thought I did speak up... Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL