X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BA2D1B4C5
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 19:38:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 57010-05
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:38:56 -0400 (AST)
Received: from curie.credativ.org (credativ.com [217.160.209.18])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62AED1C9BB
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:38:50 -0400 (AST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2132D55EF7; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:38:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from colt.pezone.net (dsl-213-023-254-012.arcor-ip.net
	[213.23.254.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BA2B655BEB; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:38:56 +0100 (CET)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: josh@agliodbs.com
Subject: Re: pgFoundry
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:38:56 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
Cc: <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
References: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F5DD@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
	<200403111243.31061.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<200403111114.33954.josh@agliodbs.com>
In-Reply-To: <200403111114.33954.josh@agliodbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200403112038.56027.peter_e@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS at credativ.com
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200403/141
X-Sequence-Number: 3957

Josh Berkus wrote:
> The only thing which was not discussed was the domain, which we
> regarded as incidental to the installation, which I already
> mentioned, and I apologize for not figuring out that people would
> have an opinion about it.

That was my point and evidently you were mistaken.  If the domain name 
were incidental, then we might as well have stuck with gborg, because 
that is what many people are used to.

Everybody had agreed to <project>.postgresql.net, and now it's gone 
without explanation.