From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: "Gavin M. Roy" <gmr@ehpg.net>
Subject: Re: New News Entry
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:26:47 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404141953060.20490-100000@emo.org.tr>
	<200404141903.38690.peter_e@gmx.net> <407D71EF.5060705@ehpg.net>
In-Reply-To: <407D71EF.5060705@ehpg.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200404141926.47307.peter_e@gmx.net>

Gavin M. Roy wrote:
> If it's a substantial contribution, which some would argue that
> Nested Transactions alone is, and it's not vapor-ware, whats the
> problem with that?

So far it is vaporware. And no one can verify what kind of agreement has 
been made or who is developing this code or whether it will go into any 
release.  The people coding it aren't even mentioned.  It's just the 
same old "MySQL 4.1 will include views" nonsense that we should stay 
away from.