X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 64E93D1C93C; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:44:31 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 46961-02; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:44:33 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from curie.credativ.org (credativ.com [217.160.209.18])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B156FD1BACD; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:44:29 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0493056393; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:44:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from www.credativ.de (pD95F9C49.dip.t-dialin.net [217.95.156.73])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1EBC156392; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:44:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from farnsworth.credativ.de (farnsworth.credativ.de [172.26.14.18])
	by www.credativ.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 85B091C0086; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:44:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>
Subject: Re: banner abominations
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:44:24 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1
Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>,
	pgsql-www@postgresql.org
References: <40856E91.50608@cs.msu.su> <20040420212337.X780@ganymede.hub.org>
	<40861EEA.7090806@cs.msu.su>
In-Reply-To: <40861EEA.7090806@cs.msu.su>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200404211444.24508.peter_e@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS at credativ.com
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200404/186
X-Sequence-Number: 4290

Am Mittwoch, 21. April 2004 09:12 schrieb Alexey Borzov:
> The obvious question: why? Do we just like that antique 90s look or are
> there other reasons?

It's not like we're hauling in mad cash that way either.  I think there are 
better ways to acknowledge mirror providers and promote other open-source 
projects.  The commercial advertisements just have an unethical feeling about 
it unless there is some public accounting.