X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADD3D1BAD5; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 08:39:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15527-09; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 08:39:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from lakermmtao01.cox.net (lakermmtao01.cox.net [68.230.240.38]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E21D1B8B7; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 08:39:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (really [24.136.37.245]) by lakermmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040424113907.RFEV8483.lakermmtao01.cox.net@[192.168.0.13]>; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 07:39:07 -0400 From: Robert Treat To: Shachar Shemesh Subject: Re: Do we prefer software that works or software that looks good? Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 07:48:18 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL advocacy References: <7305.1082779876@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4089F9ED.6000108@shemesh.biz> In-Reply-To: <4089F9ED.6000108@shemesh.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200404240748.18313.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200404/181 X-Sequence-Number: 4153 On Saturday 24 April 2004 01:23, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >PS: I resisted the temptation to SET THIS MESSAGE IN ALL UPPER CASE > >to make the point about readability. But if you want to argue the > >point with me, I'll be happy to do that for the rest of the thread. > > Yes, it's a well known rhetoric technique. Take whatever argument your > opponent say, and exagerate it to an absurd. > Kind of like changing the subject line of a thread to imply your side of the argument is the one that has technical merit and the other side is being petty and/or frivolous? Anyone who has studied software useability will know that uppercase should, in general, be avoided as it hurts readability. It isn't about "looking pretty", it's about being more usable. Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL