X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7588D1B437
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 24 Apr 2004 17:32:44 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 09022-09
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 24 Apr 2004 17:32:45 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E308CD1B521
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 17:32:42 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 22AC736237; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 17:32:45 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 163BD36233; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 17:32:45 -0300 (ADT)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 17:32:45 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org
To: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Neptune Upgraded
In-Reply-To: <50017.80.177.99.193.1082835220.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20040424173150.P42925@ganymede.hub.org>
References: <20040424112508.T42925@ganymede.hub.org>
	<50017.80.177.99.193.1082835220.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200404/210
X-Sequence-Number: 4314

On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, Dave Page wrote:

> It's rumoured that Marc G. Fournier once said:
> >
> > Everything came up fine, except for search.postgresql.org ... I had to
> > manually run the searchd process on reboot ...
> >
>
> Hmm, can't see why - rc.local looks OK. Can you see what I got wrong?

Looks fine to me too ... only thing I could think of was your if -x path
was wrong ... sould the locks be removed *before* the process is started?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664