X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B94DD1B432; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 19:44:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52745-02; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 19:44:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from lakermmtao03.cox.net (lakermmtao03.cox.net [68.230.240.36]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3036D1B43D; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 19:44:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (really [24.136.37.245]) by lakermmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040424224405.CQOJ22312.lakermmtao03.cox.net@[192.168.0.13]>; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 18:44:05 -0400 From: Robert Treat To: Shachar Shemesh Subject: Re: Do we prefer software that works or software that looks good? Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 18:53:16 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL advocacy References: <200404240909.46173.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <408A69F2.7090103@shemesh.biz> In-Reply-To: <408A69F2.7090103@shemesh.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200404241853.16535.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200404/195 X-Sequence-Number: 4167 On Saturday 24 April 2004 09:21, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Robert Treat wrote: > >Oh well... let's see if we can find a way to support both... > > You are welcome to join the other leg of this thread, then. That one is > not CCed to advocacy, as it is 100% technical. > I'm already there... Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL