X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3DDD1B521 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 16:05:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90553-06 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 16:05:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from web50308.mail.yahoo.com (web50308.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.62]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E12CD1B544 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 16:05:06 -0300 (ADT) Message-ID: <20040424190506.42495.qmail@web50308.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [4.155.105.182] by web50308.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:05:06 PDT Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:05:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Jordan Henderson Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What can we learn from MySQL? To: Bruno Wolff III , pgsql@mohawksoft.com Cc: Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL advocacy In-Reply-To: <20040424171001.GA19570@wolff.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS X-Spam-Level: *** X-Archive-Number: 200404/236 X-Sequence-Number: 4208 I think that when considering install, it is very important, if not critical, that we all understand who is doing the install. Certainly if it is a person much like us, meaning people on the hackers/development list, we can all handle more terse installs. Personally, I like the freedom of choices, and not having a result of hundreds of megs that I know are not required. On the other hand, we are really a minority. The masses certainly like simple installs, regardless of just how many megs are used, needed or not. If the masses really cared, then Microsoft would be in trouble. But, as we can see in the market place, they don't. In fact, most people think more is better. Somehow they think 2 CDROMs is better than 1 CDROM. So, if it takes an extra 200 meg to make a glitsy install with little videos expounding on how great Postgresql is, then for that user, it will make all of the difference. We need to remember who the audience is. We cannot gain mass market share otherwise. My 2 cents, won't buy coffee, Jordan Henderson --- Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 16:36:57 -0400, > pgsql@mohawksoft.com wrote: > > > > Ease of use is VERY important, but few suggestions > that address this are > > ever really accepted. Yes, focusing on the > functionality is the primary > > concern, but "how" you set it up and deploy it is > VERY important. You guys > > need to remember, people are coming from a world > where MySQL, Oracle, and > > MSSQL all have nice setup programs. > > "nice" must be in the eye of the beholder. I have > used Oracle's installer > to install a client and was not amused by it need > hundreds of megabtyes > to do a client install. > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend