X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98784D1B8B4; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 13:42:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 70075-10; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 13:42:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC92FD1B897; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 13:42:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CE980353F8; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 13:42:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACB135208; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 13:42:52 -0300 (ADT) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 13:42:52 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Tim Conrad Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL advocacy Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What can we learn from MySQL? In-Reply-To: <20040427161246.GB67934@external.timconrad.org> Message-ID: <20040427134215.I60328@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200404262213.44601.jm@poure.com> <200404262041.i3QKfZs28845@candle.pha.pa.us> <20040427152753.GA34713@external.timconrad.org> <20040427124336.R60328@ganymede.hub.org> <20040427161246.GB67934@external.timconrad.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200404/258 X-Sequence-Number: 4230 On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Tim Conrad wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 12:58:59PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Tim Conrad wrote: > > > > > 2) There doesn't seem to be a clear roadmap on Postgres features. > > > When certian things are expected. There's the TODO list that > > > Bruce maintains, but it only outlines 'near' fixes. MySQL has a > > > nice listing of what to expect in certian future versions. > > > > Not possible for us, since we have no "upper management" that dictates > > what features get added, for when ... > > Not entirely true. I've read enough on the lists to see Bruce or > others saying 'x feature isn't expected until version y.z'. Heck, to > me, something that says 'we're hoping for feature x in version y.z', > but it's not an exact science. See the MySQL releases as an example > :) Ah, then in that case, look at the TODO list, pull out all items that have a name beside them, and for those, they aren't expected until the next version .. :) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664