X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0B76ED1E326; Wed, 12 May 2004 17:35:00 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 68659-02; Wed, 12 May 2004 17:34:40 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server228.ethosmedia.com
	[209.128.84.228]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 41291D1E27F; Wed, 12 May 2004 17:34:37 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from [64.81.245.111] (HELO 192.168.1.102)
	by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
	with ESMTP id 5078074; Wed, 12 May 2004 13:36:08 -0700
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com
Organization: Aglio Database Solutions
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>,
	Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 13:34:54 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>, elein <elein@varlena.com>,
	Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>,
	"pgsql-www@postgresql.org" <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
References: <200405120946.01804.josh@postgresql.org>
	<1084395267.62466.39.camel@jester>
	<20040512154735.A35531@ganymede.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040512154735.A35531@ganymede.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200405121334.54328.josh@agliodbs.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200405/46
X-Sequence-Number: 4425

Marc,

> Valid question ... but, IMHO, if we are going to define (and I'm not
> saying that we need to) a UG, the one thing that should be defined is
> "region of coverage" ... having one UG say that its "for France" is, IMHO,
> way way too broad.  Never having been there myself, but even if based
> centrally in Paris (semi-central to the country, no?), I can imagine it
> the country is larger then a 1hr driving radius from there, no?

I think this is way too micro-managed.   Who has time for this stuff?  Let the 
users' groups declare themselves however they want.

I would *love* to have the problem of so many users' groups that they overlap.   
May I point out that we currently have 3, and two have yet to have a meeting?

-- 
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco