public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: David Fetter <[email protected]>
To: PostgreSQL WWW <[email protected]>
Cc: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Rod Taylor <[email protected]>
Cc: elein <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 14:15:41 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<1084395267.62466.39.camel@jester>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 06:03:45PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > Josh Berkus <[email protected]> writes:
> > > I would *love* to have the problem of so many users' groups that
> > > they overlap.
> >
> > I agree with Josh.  We can sort it out if and when there's
> > actually a conflict, but at the moment this argument seems pretty
> > pointless.
> 
> I have to agree with Robert on this though ... a UG, at least what I
> think is the defacto standard for it, is a group that gets together
> ... linking to "PostgreSQL related web sites" is not for
> pug.postgresql.org, or, at least, shouldn't be

Why not?

> ... a 'Related Sites' link off of www.postgresql.org, yes ...
> 
> I'm not so much worried about micro-managing, but there should be
> *some* criteria for inclusion,

Great!  How about willingness to be included?  At this stage, that's
plenty.

> and I think monthly, schedualed meetings should be a big one ...

Please pardon me while I add in a little reality check to this grand
plan.  SF PostgreSQL Users' Group, far and away the largest to date,
has had one once every 2-3 months.  According to this "criterion,"
there are no pugs at all right now, let alone three fledgling ones.

Cheers,
D
-- 
David Fetter [email protected] http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100   mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!

view thread (21+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox