X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F9314B281F for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:58:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94466-02 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 01:58:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE52714B2800 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:58:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 991C83AE23; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:58:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820E73AE04; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:58:21 -0300 (ADT) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:58:21 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Tom Lane Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, Robert Treat , Dave Page , PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list? In-Reply-To: <15683.1092251320@sss.pgh.pa.us> Message-ID: <20040811225622.A62519@ganymede.hub.org> References: <1092244663.8616.2240.camel@camel> <200408111048.09351.josh@agliodbs.com> <15683.1092251320@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/89 X-Sequence-Number: 4864 On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus writes: >> Yes. I especially want to give the Win users someplace other than >> GENERAL to go; I've unsubbed from that list due to traffic. > > I've got mixed feelings about this. I agree with the fear that > Windows-related messages might drown out the rest of the traffic ... > but that may happen *anyway*. > > Based on what I've seen (and I do sub to nearly all the pg lists), > we have too many lists, not too few. People post into the wrong > list all the time, because they don't know about or can't be bothered > to subscribe to the one that their message would be most on-topic for. > Or maybe they just don't know enough to realize that their problem > relates to a particular area. It's particularly bad for bug reports; > people will send messages describing bugs or possible bugs almost > anyplace. 'k ... as a tangent to this thread, should we look at cleaning up / removing some lists? Merging a couple or something like that? I don't find any of them get a horrendously amount of traffic compared to other lists I'm on, but I use a threaded mail reader too, which helps reduce the index size ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664