X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D6B5E37D0 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:38:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43813-09 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:38:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server226.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.226]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D43B5E37CB for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:38:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [63.195.55.98] (HELO spooky) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 6060019; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:39:45 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Josh Berkus Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: "Dave Page" , "PostgreSQL www" Subject: Re: PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list? Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:37:59 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200408120937.59254.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/106 X-Sequence-Number: 4881 Dave, > I think the same applies to many *nix users these days now that it's so > easy to get a copy of Linux and give it a try. Mind you, I don't know > that it would be 70% any more than you do ;-) Well, it's a very rough estimate. ;-) Based mostly on my clients who use Windows. > Have you used any well admin'ed 2K/2K3 servers? I have roughly equal > numbers of Linux and Windows 2K/2K3 servers here and get roughly equal > reliability from both. I get far more hardware problems than OS, and > they don't care what you're running. Windows may still be riddled with > security holes, but it is pretty stable these days. Yes, but unfortunately there are a great number of *badly* adminned Windows machines out there, and those are the ones I'm talking about. > Nor would I want to see one in there about how ext-3 is horribly borked > on Linux 2.6.66. Yeah, that belongs on -performance ;-) > I hardly think it's fair to assume that all Windows > users are too stupid to post in the right place, but *nix users aren't. Oh, I was basing my suggestions on the current number of Linux/BSD/OSX users we get who have no idea where to go and, for example, post basic SQL questions to -Hackers and connection problems to -sql. > Even if it does look that way in the future, it may well just be because > there end up being far more Windows users, but with a constant > percentage of plonkers. Yep. > I think I agree with Tom on this one - lets wait and see. It may be that > a wholesale re-organisation of the lists will be the best option. If that's the way you feel. However, I don't want this list to lose sight of the fact that *us* recieving 50-100 extra email/day on some list or another is a qualitatively different thing from a newbie signing up on NOVICE and immediately getting hit with 200 e-mails in the first 12 hours. You and I will wade through that amount of e-mail regardless, because we subscribe to most of the lists, but for a new user with a Yahoo account on dial-up, its a fundamentally different thing. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco