X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF695E3AC5 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:05:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56562-10 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:05:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server226.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.226]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E747D5E37D0 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:05:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [64.81.245.111] (HELO temoku.sf.agliodbs.com) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 6061912; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:07:10 -0700 From: Josh Berkus Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: "Dave Page" Subject: Re: Request for download stats on release Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:06:12 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Cc: "PostgreSQL www" References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200408121406.12701.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/114 X-Sequence-Number: 4889 Dave, > Yeah, but I think what Peter was suggesting was that if you got the same > figure from the same mirrors for 8.0, then at least you could say 'well, > it looks like a 175% increase over last time from these 10 mirrors, > let's assume the rest are the same' Yeah, that would be good. Do you think the mirrors would go for it? -- -Josh Berkus "A developer of Very Little Brain" Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco