X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557525E4738 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 20:10:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96322-05 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 19:10:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-46-91.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.91]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B8D5E471A for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 20:10:04 +0100 (BST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C1A7735B2C; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 16:10:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33CD35A9B; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 16:10:16 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 16:10:16 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Josh Berkus Cc: John Hansen , Oleg Bartunov , PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List Subject: Re: Suggestion for improving Archives In-Reply-To: <200409041153.53912.josh@agliodbs.com> Message-ID: <20040904160437.O812@ganymede.hub.org> References: <5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE5618A@rodrick.geeknet.com.au> <200409041153.53912.josh@agliodbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/34 X-Sequence-Number: 5104 On Sat, 4 Sep 2004, Josh Berkus wrote: > Guys, > >> However, only one of those resources, pgsql.ru, could be made to make >> available new threads on an hourly basis, or maybe even realtime. >> >> Either way, I'm not fuzzed, whichever works the best. > > Hmmmm ..... > > =========================== > Click to Search the Archives: > > -- PGSQL.ru's Full Text Search of Archives using OpenFTS (fast, all PostgreSQL > sites) > > -- Google Groups (fast, general search of Usenet and PostgreSQL mailing lists) > > -- Monharc Archive Search (slow but includes up-to-the-last-hour posts) When is the last time you used the search on archives.postgresql.org? The following was searching mvcc: "Documents 1-10 of total 1576 found. Searching in 390035 documents took 0.037 seconds." the following was searching 'wal vadim': "Documents 1-10 of total 880 found. Searching in 390035 documents took 0.441 seconds." the following was searching "postgresql releases 8.0": "Documents 1-10 of total 2190 found. Searching in 390035 documents took 1.882 seconds." the followign was searching "nested transaction support": "Documents 1-10 of total 383 found. Searching in 390035 documents took 4.714 seconds." Not what I'd consider "slow" ... granted, that last one on Google too .2 seconds, but when we can build a server farm like them, then I'll be worried about 4secs vs .2 :) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664