X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5DA5E48FE; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 03:34:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82106-06; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 02:33:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao11.cox.net (lakermmtao11.cox.net [68.230.240.28]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD335E48F4; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 03:33:51 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (really [24.170.192.108]) by lakermmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709) with ESMTP id <20040905023408.BZNJ6461.lakermmtao11.cox.net@[192.168.0.9]>; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 22:34:08 -0400 From: Robert Treat To: "Dave Page" Subject: Re: Comment forms in interactive docs Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 22:32:49 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , "Tom Lane" , "Devrim GUNDUZ" , "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409042232.49468.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/38 X-Sequence-Number: 5108 On Friday 03 September 2004 03:18, Dave Page wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org > > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier > > Sent: 03 September 2004 00:57 > > To: Tom Lane > > Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ; PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List > > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Comment forms in interactive docs > > > > On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Devrim GUNDUZ writes: > > >> There are comments forms interactive docs. I think we > > > > should remove them. > > > > >> Who follows the user comments in there? I'm sure, noone! > > > > > > Actually, we've made a practice of scavenging for useful > > > > comments at > > > > > least once a release cycle. There's a lot of crud in > > > > there, I agree, > > > > > but some good ideas about missing material too. Anyway, > > > > what is your > > > > > idea of "interactive" docs if not ones that people can comment on? > > > > I know that I tend to make extensive use of the user > > 'comments' when I'm looking at similar in the PHP docs ... > > you usually get some valuable examples that the docs are > > seriously lacking ... > > Very true, the php idocs are excellent. The question is, how do we > encourage submissions of the same quality, without all the 'Where can I > get pdf docs' and 'why doesn't my C program work' questions? > I believe one significant difference is the php doc submissions are moderated, and therefore subject to less cruft. I've suggested in the past that doc submissions get posted to -www or -doc, but neither group seemed interested in supporting that. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL