X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32B1329C67 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 04:01:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37295-02 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 03:01:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99F7329C63 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 04:01:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF9C48FEA9 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:01:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95790-07; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 03:01:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-46-91.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.91]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A47148FE9C; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:01:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 26D2338CE3; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:01:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECDF37550; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:01:40 -0300 (ADT) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:01:40 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Tom Lane Cc: Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Devel docs build wedged? In-Reply-To: <28695.1095128432@sss.pgh.pa.us> Message-ID: <20040913235907.T1081@ganymede.hub.org> References: <28695.1095128432@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/99 X-Sequence-Number: 5169 On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/buildlog.html > claims that a docs rebuild was done starting at 23:29 UTC > (two hours ago now) ... but AFAICS the updated docs haven't > been installed. Is the batch job wedged, or is it just that > svr1 is even more overloaded than usual? > > (It may or may not be relevant that the log page doesn't show any > "build finished" time. It is saying "Build completed successfully" > though ...) Did the build crash? Its not running, neither the VM or server has been restarted since last Tuesday, and the load is low ... I'm not finding any lock files or anything, but I may be missing one ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664