X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B30B329C70 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 04:03:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05689-09 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 03:03:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [207.106.42.251]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1A9329C6B for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 04:03:25 +0100 (BST) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i8P33NJ14688; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:03:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200409250303.i8P33NJ14688@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: Fwd: [#14662768] Problems with certain groups? In-Reply-To: <82DF9038-0E99-11D9-BC40-003065BA8704@pacbell.net> To: Dan Wolfe Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:03:23 -0400 (EDT) Cc: PostgreSQL www X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL108 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/168 X-Sequence-Number: 5238 WWW guys: I just received this from someone about Google archiving being terminated. Seems amazing but I checked Google and it seems true. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dan Wolfe wrote: > Bruce, > > I don't know who to send this to but I'm sure that you would. > > Basically Google is no longer archiving the comp.databases.postgresql* > groups. > > As they indicate it seems as if they will reconsider it if enough > people petition for it. > > - Dan > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: groups-support@google.com > Date: September 23, 2004 1:35:13 PM PDT > To: "Dan Wolfe" > Subject: Re: [#14662768] Problems with certain groups? > > Hi Dan, > > Thank you for your note. It seems that these groups are no longer > archived. Typically when a group is tagged as 'no longer archived' it is > because it is a duplicated group or does not have substantial traffic. > > If a newsgroup is classified as 'no longer archived' it cannot be posted > to through Google. However, we can review the group for > re-classification > if petitioned by users. > > Regards, > The Google Team > > Original Message Follows: > ------------------------ > From: Dan Wolfe > Subject: Problems with certain groups? > Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:07:20 -0700 > > Hello, > > can someone please check the feed for the following groups - they > haven't been updated since 9/16... which is weird because they > typically have much more traffic... > > comp.databases.postgresql.admin > comp.databases.postgresql.general > comp.databases.postgresql.hackers > comp.databases.postgresql.novice > comp.databases.postgresql.questions > comp.databases.postgresql.sql > > > thanks, > > - Dan > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073