X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D49329CF7 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:42:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31724-09 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:42:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.dbitech.ca (radius.wavefire.com [64.141.13.252]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17763329EE6 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:41:38 +0100 (BST) Received: (qmail 15407 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2004 18:32:17 -0000 Received: from dbitech.wavefire.com (HELO ?64.141.15.253?) (darcy@64.141.15.253) by radius.wavefire.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2004 18:32:17 -0000 From: Darcy Buskermolen Organization: Wavefire Technologies Corp. To: Bruce Momjian , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:41:30 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200409291713.i8THDLn14086@candle.pha.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <200409291713.i8THDLn14086@candle.pha.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409291041.30627.darcy@wavefire.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/242 X-Sequence-Number: 5312 On September 29, 2004 10:13 am, you wrote: > It is my opinion that we have to make major changes in the way we > provide hosting for our servers. There are several problems: > > o Location of servers > > The location of our servers in Panama is a problem. They are too far > for any PostgreSQL maintainers to access. Changing hardware or > diagnosing problems has been too hard. I have had like 2 days of > downtime on my home machine in the past 12 years. We have had more than > 2 days of downtime in the past 6 months. My wife would not accept such > a reliability level. Yes location is a bit of a concern, but I think it's muchless of a concern than the rest of the issues. I think with hardware/jail issues sorted out this one will for the most part take careof it's self, or at least be far less apparent. > > o FreeBSD > > The use of FreeBSD jails can cause servers to take +8 hours to fsck on a > server crash or power failure. Again, I would never accept such > problems on my home server so it is hard to fathom how a project with > thousands of users can accept that. Either we need to find a fix, stop > using jails, or get another operating system, but continuing to use a > setup with a known problem is just asking for trouble. The over use of jails I think is complicating things, what are the odds that someone could find it in their heart to raid the old hardware pile in their serverback room, and come up with a PIII 800MHz + system with a gig of ram that they could donate to the cause, and we move some of the more critical services (www/ftp/anoncvs) to that box without jails. Yahoo, Pair, Fugtisu, Affilias , Somebody, Anybody??? > > o Web site > > We have been talking about a new web page layout for years at this > point. I almost don't care if they just put a dancing bear up on the > web site. Let's do something! One thing I know we can do here to help at least the availability of the website itself, is to use a round-robin DNS based setup. I know Marc adjusted DNS records to point the main website at www3.ca a while back during a time that www was stuck in fsck hell. As for the website redesign, I agree fully, it's been talked about for at least 3 full releases now and from my understanding it's no closer now than it was before. Can anybody comment on the hold up here? > > o Archives > > The archives situation is a continual problem. Again, maybe a dancing > bear can help. :-) What about combining the efforts od pgsql.ru and command prompt to do this, or maybe even monarc or google groups ? > > Basically, with no money and no one offering servers, I don't see a good > solution to any of these problems, but I think we need to recognize > these are problems and that we will continue to suffer until they are > addressed. Ok i know how much we all hate banner adds and the like, but what about using Google ads especially on the archives to help generate income to fund these requirements? > > Are there any proposals, no matter how radical, to correct these? -- Darcy Buskermolen Wavefire Technologies Corp. ph: 250.717.0200 fx: 250.763.1759 http://www.wavefire.com