X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FE232A10E for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:24:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12247-08 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:24:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0535A32A10C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:24:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E37490C7E for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:24:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12247-07; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:24:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-46-91.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.91]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E78148FE78; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:24:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 66050350CC; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:24:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621EB345A2; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:24:16 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:24:16 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Oleg Bartunov Cc: John Hansen , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: archives.postgresql.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040930112305.N3407@ganymede.hub.org> References: <1096518972.12322.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20040930105736.L3407@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/291 X-Sequence-Number: 5361 On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, John Hansen wrote: >> >>> Guys, >>> >>> Now that archives has moved to commandprompt and changed layout, can we >>> please get the last-modified issue fixed, before I start the recrawl? >> >> What's wrong with the last-modified date? I checked it the other day, and >> it looked fine to me ... > > you use for last-modified date, but crawlers does prefer more > standard way via http headers, as you once did using 'touch' hack > (what's wrong with it ?) To be honest, I want to figure out how to do it off of Message Date properly, instead of time stamp of the file ... that way, if we have to regenerate, all the 'last-modified' do stay the same ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664