X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B3D32A346; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:12:59 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81969-09; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:12:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mr1.surnet.cl (av1.surnet.cl [216.155.73.168]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A061632A335; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:12:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp1.surnet.cl (216.155.73.168) by mr1.surnet.cl (7.0.024) id 413F2C37003BA1FA; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:11:50 -0400 Received: from av1.surnet.cl ([216.155.73.168]) by smtp1.surnet.cl (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:11:49 -0400 (CLT) Received: from cluster.surnet.cl (216.155.73.165) by smtp1.surnet.cl (7.0.024) id 413F2C340033E564; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:11:49 -0400 Received: from 216.155.88.75.dsl.surnet.cl (216.155.71.145) by cluster.surnet.cl (7.0.024) (authenticated as alvherre@surnet.cl) id 4134D3220034FE1D; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:11:53 -0400 Received: by 216.155.88.75.dsl.surnet.cl (Postfix, from userid 500) id DC7A93270; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:11:53 -0400 (CLT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:11:53 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Neil Conway Cc: Dave Page , Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL www , PostgreSQL advocacy Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Infrastructure TODO list Message-ID: <20040930131153.GA4783@dcc.uchile.cl> References: <1096537952.25277.377.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1096537952.25277.377.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DSBL X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200409/276 X-Sequence-Number: 5346 On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 07:52:32PM +1000, Neil Conway wrote: > On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 17:49, Dave Page wrote: > > All the other issues are/have been worked on: > > I'm glad to see that improvements are being made. However, part of the > reason I think we need additional changes is that it took *so long* to > make these improvements in the first place; the archives have been > semi-functional (at best!) for many months (years?), for example. Please note that there is *still* no way to get the archives in mbox or similar format. This is a standard features of a lot of the lists I've seen and I've used it a lot of times. It's amazingly useful sometimes. Both Neil and I (at least) have asked for this in the past, several times. (hmm ... is that "Neil and I" or "Neil and me"?) -- Alvaro Herrera () "There was no reply" (Kernel Traffic)