X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCBF329CB7; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 04:11:43 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42730-07; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 03:11:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [207.106.42.251]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8073032B407; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 04:11:27 +0100 (BST) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i993B4q24509; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 23:11:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200410090311.i993B4q24509@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Google archiving us again In-Reply-To: <8380.1096083047@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 23:11:04 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Dan Wolfe , PostgreSQL www , PostgreSQL advocacy X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL108 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200410/104 X-Sequence-Number: 5498 Google is now archiving us again! http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1&group=comp.databases.postgresql.hackers Notice the current dates and no mention of the archive being stopped. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > I just received this from someone about Google archiving being > > terminated. Seems amazing but I checked Google and it seems true. > > Yeah, I noticed that last night --- they seem to have shut it off as of > the 16th or so. We should probably tell people about this on all the > mail lists and encourage complaints. > > >> Thank you for your note. It seems that these groups are no longer > >> archived. Typically when a group is tagged as 'no longer archived' it is > >> because it is a duplicated group or does not have substantial traffic. > > I can't believe either of those claims. > > Where does one complain to, exactly? > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073