X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7733732AFB3 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 13:34:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48204-09 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 12:34:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FC0032AEB1 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 13:34:00 +0100 (BST) Received: (qmail 14623 invoked by uid 65534); 9 Oct 2004 12:34:00 -0000 Received: from dsl-213-023-255-242.arcor-ip.net (EHLO colt.pezone.net) (213.23.255.242) by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 09 Oct 2004 14:34:00 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 From: Peter Eisentraut To: "Cornelia Boenigk" , "PostgreSQL advocacy" Subject: Re: PostgreSQL classification Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 14:33:58 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200410090311.i993B4q24509@candle.pha.pa.us> <001601c4adfb$11c6bc10$0201a8c0@zwerg2000> In-Reply-To: <001601c4adfb$11c6bc10$0201a8c0@zwerg2000> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410091433.58967.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200410/21 X-Sequence-Number: 5509 Cornelia Boenigk wrote: > A German company wants (maybe) migrate to PostgreSQL and asked: > - is PostgreSQL classified? Does it have a ECCN (for example 5D002, > 5D992, etc.)?? > - is PostgreSQL considered as EAR99 product > - are there any export restrictions for PostgreSQL? Why would a German company care about U.S. export classifications? -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/