Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:42:17 -0400 (AST)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org,
	Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>, Omar Kilani <omar@tinysofa.org>,
	pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design
In-Reply-To: <200411122336.44741.peter_e@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <20041113004136.S3792@ganymede.hub.org>
References: <200411122226.iACMQ8T28212@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<200411121431.57422.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<200411122336.44741.peter_e@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> OK, fair enough.  Now can someone explain how we can put out a
>>> release evrery 8-12 months with 200-300 changes, some very complex,
>>> and we can't get a group together to update a web site?
>>
>> Because a lot less people are working on the web site, and none of
>> them are paid to do so?
>
> We put out regular releases long before (some) people started getting
> paid for their work.  If now we're only getting work done if someone's
> getting paid for it, we're in trouble.

I agree ... IMHO, its like docs ... its not something ppl want to do, 
since they have a perception that its not as "cool' as orking on the code 
...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664