X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C013A4E30 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:09:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35159-09 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:09:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server226.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.226]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB003A4E08 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:08:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [64.81.245.111] (account josh@agliodbs.com HELO temoku.sf.agliodbs.com) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 6686846; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:09:46 -0800 From: Josh Berkus Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: Robert Treat Subject: Re: Vote on Omar Design Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:10:57 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org References: <200411181953.10646.josh@agliodbs.com> <200411191107.44086.josh@agliodbs.com> <1100901738.389.169.camel@camel> In-Reply-To: <1100901738.389.169.camel@camel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411191510.57221.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/261 X-Sequence-Number: 5992 Robert, > I'm sure it would be more work, but swapping to Omar's design is not a > magic bullet for everything on the TODO list. Absolutely correct. I'm interested because Omar's offering to help port content. If he weren't, I'd say "oh, ho-hum, another design". > Read the archives, it has been discussed a number of times. It was > mentioned specifically in regards to this design here: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2004-11/msg00146.php Cool, will read up. I may want to revisit this; I'm not certain that I'm in favor of "stretchy", but I don't remember the arguments. > This is a baseless accusation and quite honestly I am offended by it. I > have never said the web team can guide anything without discussing our > reasoning. Hell I'm one of the few who have advocated making the web > development process more open. And we *have* discussed the changes right > here on this list. A Lot. Good. Let's keep discussing them, and not accuse people of "power grabs" when they disagree? > afaik the gborg mailing lists are all public archives, and thats where > you'll find our commit logs. (If it isn't, it isn't because we have > requested it to remain private. Actually, it's because GBorg is unhappy today. > What I want to see Omar work on is 1)Resolving the banner ads issue, > 2)Resolving the stretchy issue, and 3) Working up a patch to implement > his design against current CVS. Those are pretty concrete. Omar, got a response? -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco