X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9835B3A4C42 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:30:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26645-09 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:30:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BD03A4C19 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:30:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EE912B00E for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:30:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28935-03; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:30:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-46-91.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.91]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E905212AFBE; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:30:33 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B600B36690; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:30:34 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C9F36654; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:30:34 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:30:34 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Josh Berkus Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Vote on Omar Design In-Reply-To: <200411191107.44086.josh@agliodbs.com> Message-ID: <20041119152113.T75727@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200411181953.10646.josh@agliodbs.com> <419DB399.2010008@cs.msu.su> <200411191107.44086.josh@agliodbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/256 X-Sequence-Number: 5987 On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Josh Berkus wrote: > Who's "we"? I don't recall a spec document anywhere that says that the > design has to be "stretchy", nor do I recall any discussion on this list > to that effect. Maybe my memory is faulty, give me a link. Actually, fixed width has been something that has been avoided as far as design is concerned since day one ... I even seem to recall a whole thread on it, since some like the whole 'fixed width' perspective (me included), while others like the 'use up what you can of my browser' design ... > 1) Omar's design is undeniably better-looking and easier to navigate > than Lucasz's; Can someone re-post Omar's design? Make it easier to compare :) The only thing I recall missing from it was the banner on the top of the right menu ... > 2) Porting to Omar's design rather than Lucasz's will make no difference in > the go-live time of the web site; Actually, isn't Lucasz's design already what is live on wwwdevel? I'm not 100% sure what the hold up on getting things live is ... but looking at wwwdevel, it all looks to be there ... > No, it's a vote on what we want Omar and others to work on; patching > Lucasz's design or porting to his own. I vote the latter -- unless, of > course, you want to argue the 3 points above. The only thing the CFV missed, I believe, was links to the two design to make the determination ... I just don't remember Omar's design anymore :( ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664