X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B333A4F13 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 03:02:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20014-09 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 03:02:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741113A4F09 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 03:02:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2713912B2A3 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:02:07 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19782-08; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 03:02:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-46-91.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.91]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB9712B288; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:01:59 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 66DE13A3CA; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:02:05 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BF038856; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:02:05 -0400 (AST) Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:02:05 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Josh Berkus Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width In-Reply-To: <200411201216.44490.josh@agliodbs.com> Message-ID: <20041120225913.C18806@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200411181953.10646.josh@agliodbs.com> <200411191107.44086.josh@agliodbs.com> <1100901738.389.169.camel@camel> <200411201216.44490.josh@agliodbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/284 X-Sequence-Number: 6015 On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Josh Berkus wrote: > So, do people have reasons why one is better than the other? I like fix-width since it tends to mean that the "layout" will be the same no matter how I stretch/shrink my browser ... for example, the news links will always span the same # of lines, as opposed to sometimes spanning three lines cause I'm too narrow, or on one line because I stretch it to its limit ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664