X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4213A461A for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 06:40:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37456-01 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 06:40:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server226.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.226]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E633A44B5 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 06:40:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [63.195.55.98] (account josh@agliodbs.com HELO spooky) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 6733641; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:42:15 -0800 From: Josh Berkus Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: Robert Treat Subject: Re: merging advocacy and "overview" Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:37:58 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org References: <200412020046.01178.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <200412020046.01178.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200412012237.58998.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/13 X-Sequence-Number: 6132 Robert, > I am current leaning toward making a new menu item called "advocacy" > and renaming the overview/about section to "community". With that here is > how I see the content breaking down into those two sections: I think this is overall a very good idea. However, I think it should be called "about" and not "advocacy". "about" is a web industry convention, and new people know to automatically go to "about" for stuff like press links, supporters, contact info, etc. Some comments below. > members{a} Doesn't this duplicate the developer site portion? > corporate{a} We'll need to come up with some rules on who can appear here. My thoughts: 1) Anyone who sponsors a full-time or 1/2 time developer; 2) Anyone who has sponsored a significant feature in the last 3 versions. 3) Anyone who contributed/runs an add-in project in recent use. > advantages{a} > case studies{a} > requestinfo{a} Definitely keep this. I'll want to revise the form, but I currently get 5-10 e-mails a day. It's been very useful. > presskit{u} Which means I need to work on a general, non-version-specific presskit, eh? Give me some time after 8.0. > license{a} > > community/ > users{ex} What is this? > store{ex} > donate{ex} > books{u} > related projects{u} > interfacing to postgresql{u} > [docs] > [support] Hmmm ... won't documentation be a top-level category? -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco