X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7393A580E; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:22:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27214-08; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:21:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server226.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.226]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA353A584F; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:21:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [63.195.55.98] (account josh@agliodbs.com HELO spooky) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 6735616; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 09:22:43 -0800 From: Josh Berkus Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: Robert Treat Subject: Re: merging advocacy and "overview" Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:18:22 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , "Marc G. Fournier" , pgsql-www@postgresql.org References: <200412020046.01178.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <41AF4963.6080102@commandprompt.com> <1102007412.2558.63.camel@camel> In-Reply-To: <1102007412.2558.63.camel@camel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200412020918.22719.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/19 X-Sequence-Number: 6138 Marc, Robert, > > > Not sure if I agree with a 'time limit' on this one ... there should > > > be some sort of 'history' section ... if we are remembering a > > > contribution, it should be remembered, not 'fade out over time' ... Well, the main reason I wanted the 3-year limit is that I don't want to try to research what companies contributed code in 1989. I expect that we'll be pretty casual about taking companies "off for expiration" -- if we ever do. > > I think Marc has an interesting point. The other issue is what about > > companies who may not sponsor a ton of code but troll the mailing lists? No. Why would we care? Unless you have a different meaning for "troll" than I do? > > Or provide major services like hosting? Yes. > > Or secondary code like the .Net > > provider? Yes, *especially* these. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco