X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1DB3A5848; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 18:54:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59612-01; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 18:53:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cookie.varlena.com (adsl-64-142-36-103.sonic.net [64.142.36.103]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9653A3CF2; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 18:53:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: by cookie.varlena.com (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.3 (i386), from userid 500) id 9C1EB394B8; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:52:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:52:09 -0800 From: elein To: Josh Berkus Cc: Robert Treat , "Joshua D. Drake" , "Marc G. Fournier" , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: merging advocacy and "overview" Message-ID: <20041202105209.R13004@cookie.varlena.com> Mail-Followup-To: Josh Berkus , Robert Treat , "Joshua D. Drake" , "Marc G. Fournier" , pgsql-www@postgresql.org References: <200412020046.01178.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <41AF4963.6080102@commandprompt.com> <1102007412.2558.63.camel@camel> <200412020918.22719.josh@agliodbs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200412020918.22719.josh@agliodbs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.05 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/25 X-Sequence-Number: 6144 And where does something like General Bits fit in as a link? Does that contribution (along with advocacy stuff) rate a corporate sponsor link? Is auxilliary information equivalent to code contributions? What about advocacy work? I obviously would like to see Varlena, LLC on the corporate sponsor list, at least for the time I spend writing and publishing. --elein On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 09:18:22AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > Marc, Robert, > > > > > Not sure if I agree with a 'time limit' on this one ... there should > > > > be some sort of 'history' section ... if we are remembering a > > > > contribution, it should be remembered, not 'fade out over time' ... > > Well, the main reason I wanted the 3-year limit is that I don't want to try to > research what companies contributed code in 1989. I expect that we'll be > pretty casual about taking companies "off for expiration" -- if we ever do. > > > > I think Marc has an interesting point. The other issue is what about > > > companies who may not sponsor a ton of code but troll the mailing lists? > > No. Why would we care? Unless you have a different meaning for "troll" than > I do? > > > > Or provide major services like hosting? > > Yes. > > > > Or secondary code like the .Net > > > provider? > > Yes, *especially* these. > > -- > Josh Berkus > Aglio Database Solutions > San Francisco > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >