Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:17:21 -0400 (AST)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>,
	pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
In-Reply-To: <200412012237.58998.josh@agliodbs.com>
Message-ID: <20041202121558.X46440@ganymede.hub.org>
References: <200412020046.01178.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	<200412012237.58998.josh@agliodbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Robert,
>
>> I am current leaning toward making a new menu item called "advocacy"
>> and renaming the overview/about section to "community".  With that here is
>> how I see the content breaking down into those two sections:
>
> I think this is overall a very good idea.  However, I think it should be
> called "about" and not "advocacy".  "about" is a web industry convention, and
> new people know to automatically go to "about" for stuff like press links,
> supporters, contact info, etc.
>
> Some comments below.
>
>>                         members{a}
>
> Doesn't this duplicate the developer site portion?
>
>>                         corporate{a}
>
> We'll need to come up with some rules on who can appear here.  My thoughts:
> 1) Anyone who sponsors a full-time or 1/2 time developer;
> 2) Anyone who has sponsored a significant feature in the last 3 versions.

Not sure if I agree with a 'time limit' on this one ... there should be 
some sort of 'history' section ... if we are remembering a contribution, 
it should be remembered, not 'fade out over time' ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664