X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913A4D9C6F for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:11:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75436-03 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:11:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server227.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.227]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E53D9C16 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:11:26 -0300 (ADT) X-EthosMedia-Virus-Scanned: no infections found Received: from [64.81.245.111] (account josh@agliodbs.com HELO temoku.sf.agliodbs.com) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 8130331; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:13:49 -0700 From: Josh Berkus Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: "Gevik babakhani" Subject: Re: PGDN and CVS Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:15:10 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, "'Magnus Hagander'" , "'Dave Page'" References: <200509211902.j8LJ2U3r060254@smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200509211902.j8LJ2U3r060254@smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509211215.11178.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.047 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.003, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200509/55 X-Sequence-Number: 8569 Gevik, > I'm not discouraged in anyway... I have just been looking over and over > for a CMS that we could use in our project. Time after time I end up > with commercial products. And even if they are opensource, they need to > be so much customized that one has to put more time in customizing the > CMS framework rather than building the actual requirement. What is it you're trying to implement, exactly, that you don't find supported? Is it the tree structure? Even if existing CMSes require customization, I think it'd be better to work with that project and try to get them involved in the feature. As far as I know, the only CMS you've really tried is Drupal. Both Bricolage and Framewerk are intimate with the PostgreSQL community and could be counted on to work with you. I don't think you even looked at Bricolage after Marc set it up. I also don't think you've evaluated "more time to implement" using valid criteria. If you do a custom CMS, you're going to need to impement all of the common stuff yourself: Authentication User management (including "e-mail me my password, etc.") Approval/rights structures Versioning admin Editors (inc. wyswyg and/or bbcode edit) RSS etc. Did your really add up coding all of the above compared to customizing an existing system? Again, I'm not trying to discourage you, but from my perspective half a CMS is worse than none. --Josh -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco