X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B6AD9CFD for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:52:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83673-08 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:52:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.35]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94AAD9CF9 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:52:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from gevbook (213-84-4-128.adsl.xs4all.nl [213.84.4.128]) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8LJqe3C059567; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:52:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from gevik@xs4all.nl) Message-Id: <200509211952.j8LJqe3C059567@smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl> From: "Gevik babakhani" To: Cc: , "'Magnus Hagander'" , "'Dave Page'" Subject: Re: PGDN and CVS Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:52:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <200509211215.11178.josh@agliodbs.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830 Thread-Index: AcW+4ImTQtwfJyjBRhCf/3KO1HDKWAABVcvg X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.04 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.040] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200509/57 X-Sequence-Number: 8571 Is this Framewerk the same as www.Framewerk.org? > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-www- > owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 9:15 PM > To: Gevik babakhani > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org; 'Magnus Hagander'; 'Dave Page' > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PGDN and CVS > > Gevik, > > > I'm not discouraged in anyway... I have just been looking over and over > > for a CMS that we could use in our project. Time after time I end up > > with commercial products. And even if they are opensource, they need to > > be so much customized that one has to put more time in customizing the > > CMS framework rather than building the actual requirement. > > What is it you're trying to implement, exactly, that you don't find > supported? Is it the tree structure? > > Even if existing CMSes require customization, I think it'd be better to > work with that project and try to get them involved in the feature. As > far as I know, the only CMS you've really tried is Drupal. > > Both Bricolage and Framewerk are intimate with the PostgreSQL community > and > could be counted on to work with you. I don't think you even looked at > Bricolage after Marc set it up. > > I also don't think you've evaluated "more time to implement" using valid > criteria. If you do a custom CMS, you're going to need to impement all of > the common stuff yourself: > Authentication > User management (including "e-mail me my password, etc.") > Approval/rights structures > Versioning admin > Editors (inc. wyswyg and/or bbcode edit) > RSS > etc. > Did your really add up coding all of the above compared to customizing an > existing system? > > Again, I'm not trying to discourage you, but from my perspective half a > CMS > is worse than none. > > --Josh > > -- > --Josh > > Josh Berkus > Aglio Database Solutions > San Francisco > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match