X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0B8D8622 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 13:56:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20053-09 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 16:55:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C399D8190 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 13:55:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881FE64BDD7 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 13:56:00 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57457-05; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 16:55:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C1764B96F; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 13:55:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BCB16348C0; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 13:56:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B1F33C57; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 13:56:04 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 13:56:04 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: Bruce Momjian Cc: PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: Lost patches email In-Reply-To: <200510081648.j98Gm7A07190@candle.pha.pa.us> Message-ID: <20051008135457.Y1477@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200510081648.j98Gm7A07190@candle.pha.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.342 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.292, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200510/13 X-Sequence-Number: 8601 Actually, I suspect that won't work anyway, since now its a duplicate of one that was already processed, which is why it would fail ... We'll have to keep a close eye on this for the next one you know didn't go through, and I'm waiting for details from the developers on how I can improve reporting without filling up the file system with debug messages :( On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> 'k, am looking into it ... if you resend it, does it fail yet again? Do >> you get nothing back indicating *why* it failed? > > Nothing. I just tried again and am staring at my mail server logs and > see nothing coming in after the email is sent out. > >> If you do send it again, please send me the log information as above >> again, since that seems to give me more then enough information to do a >> fair amount of tracing ... > > Here is a new I just sent as a test: > > Oct 8 12:44:00 candle sendmail[6592]: j98Gi0006592: from=pgman, > size=37073, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200510081644.j98Gi0006592 > @candle.pha.pa.us>, relay=pgman@localhost > > Oct 8 12:44:02 candle sendmail[6594]: j98Gi0006592: > to=pgsql-patches@postgresql.org, ctladdr=pgman (113/120), > delay=00:00:02, x delay=00:00:02, mailer=esmtp, pri=67073, > relay=svr1.postgresql.org. [200.46.204.71], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Ok: > queued as E6B3BD8 367) > > It is actually a bounce to pgpatches of my original message. > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road > + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664