X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFA1D8D09; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 13:58:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74784-06; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 16:58:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [64.139.89.126]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A790D8B50; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 13:58:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id j98GwoZ08734; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 12:58:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200510081658.j98GwoZ08734@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: Lost patches email In-Reply-To: <20051008135457.Y1477@ganymede.hub.org> To: "Marc G. Fournier" Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 12:58:50 -0400 (EDT) Cc: PostgreSQL www X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.01 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010] X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200510/14 X-Sequence-Number: 8602 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Actually, I suspect that won't work anyway, since now its a duplicate of > one that was already processed, which is why it would fail ... > > We'll have to keep a close eye on this for the next one you know didn't go > through, and I'm waiting for details from the developers on how I can > improve reporting without filling up the file system with debug messages > :( I just sent a new copy that is not a bounce but a new email, and I added a '[ repost ]' line at the top. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073